1. I believe this statement to be very true because people at the bottom in society are desparate to be someone. Desparation for popularity can make people do things they never thought they would ever do.
2. I would be upset if that happened and I didn't give him/her permission. I think everybody deserves a right to privacy, and they should be the judge of their own picture being put on the internet for millions to see.
3. The truly private life is an illusion in today's society because technology is so advanced that it is nearly impossible to keep things from the public eye. Ex. Spy cameras, internet, patriot act
4. The creolization of the media means that the media is changing way that Americas think, live, act and complete daily tasks.
5. Yes it could because the newspaper business sole purpose is to make money. They make money by selling newspapers. So they will do anything or right any story to get people to read them.
6. I think it is very weird because I don't think many people want to have their occupation status and progress put on the internet for anybody to see it.
7. I think the man who created the website isn't an actual idiot, he is just a man that loves to make money, and he did a good job of doing that.
8. I did enjoy the article very much because it is a topic that catches almost every young adults eye. Public nudity, right or wrong. I believe is she wants to have the whole world see her naked, let her practice her first amendment rights. Nudity has been around for thousands 0f years. God made everybody naked at first, we just adapted. Jesus was naked, gods and kings in Europe are remembered in nude statues. Just because she isnt a god or a king, it doesnt mean she can't be freely nude.